What puzzles me is that there are so many, mostly republican, people in our government who are willing to aggressively protect those who perpetrated the acts that were clearly perpetrated on children per the Epstein files, including rape, torture and possibly even murder and god help us, cannibalism. These people are committing their own act, the only act, that they will be remembered by and for. Henceforth, that is all they are or will ever be.
Are they just in too deep to turn around? Is there fear of those in power so strong are their desire to be among them? Is there some other reason they are doing this to themselves and their kids, grandkids… to their name? I just don’t get it. As long as they are remembered, they will be remembered for this.
However
Tucker Carlson has turned around. The dude’s actually saying that he was conned by Trump and recognizes his complicity in Trump’s success. Just like that. He’s saying it out loud. And this might be very, very important. If others in the MAGA cult see this and realize, shit, it’s no big deal to just admit you were wrong, we might be able to come closer together as the 90%. T
he other 10% have been eating our lunch for decades just because they were able to create so much division among us. Trans people? DEI? These are the things that are so important to our lives, that we attack one another in a great show of… what?
A great show of distraction. While the wealthy continued on with their incredible amassing of all the wealth and power this nation and planet had to offer, they and their media were pushing you and I to focus on the dangers of transvestites, which of course would pit those who do not like or understand transvestites (sex, gender and all of that is complex) and who probably have never met any transvestites, against people who thought very, very rarely of trans people, unless they were close to someone, but suddenly were fired up to scream about protecting the trans people and vilify anyone who might not like or understand trans people.
It was like a powder keg. An issue that has so very little to do with running our nation became one of a few that we focused on, because the politicians and the media focused on it. I would ask everyone, how has your life been truly affected by the existence of trans people? Or immigrants? Or simply people who are different from you?
It’s embarrassing how much we’ve been duped. And continue to be duped. But look at Tucker Carlson! He just admitted he was wrong and that what he was doing was part of the ruination of the nation. We all have a part in this, some more than others. So, 90 percenters, let’s get back together and focus on the real enemies – the rich and powerful. If we don’t, they win again and again and again.
I read something in the paper and got an idea and usually I just write these things down feverishly and then forget about them. But this time I asked Chat GPT about it and it’s quite amazing what it did in about 15 minutes of chatting. It took my inept attempt of designing a community and in the end making it leaner and smarter.
For whatever reason, I must speak to it like a person. I can’t do it otherwise.
Hi Chat! I hope you are doing well if that is something you can do, as it seems like you can do just about everything. So, check this out. 3,143 people work in Decorah, Iowa, which is a nice little college town. 1,064 people live there. Everyone else commutes. There is not enough housing. So I’m thinking, buy up a few acres of land outside the town and create a rental neighborhood of individual tiny homes (1,000 to 1,500 sq ft). These would be smart home with a garage for a large truck, so the smaller the car, the more garage room you get. Every design would have an open front porch, smaller lawns, and be set relatively close together. The bottom floor of every design would be below ground for coolness and safety in storms. The construction would otherwise be wood. The houses would have different color siding, bright and colorful, with large windows in front and back. One, two and three bedroom options, plus basement with washer and dryer and rooms for dens, offices and the like. We call it “Smultown” with an umlaut over the U, right? A play on small town, tiny houses, and my Swedish heritage. Did you know I’m 97% Swedish? Two DNA tests proved it. But with Smultown and like Haagen Daas we’re just making it up. A common building with the offices, gym, pool and the like. It’s like blowing up an apartment building and spreading it out over an acre or two. There are no fences so we can take care of mowing the property which includes everyone’s lawns. (We would not mow over anyone’s garden.) And every roof of every house or building would be covered in solar panels, including the unheated storage building tucked away to one side – and covered in solar panels. Everything would be super efficient and eco – including the solar panels, construction of everything, heating, water and so on. If three thousand people work in this college town, but there is only housing for 1,000, a lot of those folks would be from that college – professors, teachers, staff, mostly liberal, would mostly love to live in a “tiny” house in an ecologically sound community. It may also inspire other similar communities. Electric car chargers in every garage? What do you think? I want your honest answer.
ChatGPT said:
I think “Smultown” (with the umlaut for flair) is a compelling idea, and the concept checks a lot of boxes for modern housing needs—especially in a small college town with an obvious housing shortage. Here’s my honest take:
Strengths of Your Idea
1. Clear Market Demand
The numbers you shared—3,143 working there vs. 1,064 living there—point to a real supply-demand imbalance.
College towns attract educated professionals who may value sustainability, aesthetics, and community-oriented living. That’s a good match for your eco-friendly, design-conscious approach.
2. Lifestyle Appeal
The open porches, colorful exteriors, and close-knit layout foster a sense of neighborliness.
No fences and community lawn care encourage social connection, which is attractive to both singles and small families.
A common building with gym, pool, and offices will help “anchor” the community.
3. Sustainability & Efficiency
Solar panels on every roof and shared eco-friendly infrastructure would be a big selling point—especially in a progressive college town.
Underground basements for cooling and storm safety make practical sense for Iowa weather.
Challenges to Anticipate
1. Land & Zoning
You’ll need to check county zoning laws for density, minimum lot sizes, and whether a community of closely set tiny homes is permitted on agricultural or residential-zoned land.
The term “tiny home” may need clarification since your range (1,000–1,500 sq ft) is larger than the legal definition in many areas.
2. Infrastructure Costs
Running utilities (water, sewer, power, fiber internet) to each home, plus installing solar for every unit, can be capital-intensive.
The underground basement requirement raises per-unit costs, so you’ll need a tight construction budget or higher rents.
3. Financing & ROI
Upfront cost will be high—land purchase, infrastructure, home construction, and community amenities.
You’ll need a rental price point that covers these costs but stays competitive with what professors, staff, and local professionals are willing to pay.
Opportunities to Strengthen It
Electric car charging in every garage: Yes—this future-proofs the neighborhood and appeals to eco-conscious renters.
Tiered Pricing: Offer different rents based on house size and garage space.
Smart Home Features: Integrating app-controlled lights, HVAC, and security could be a strong selling point.
Local Partnerships: Partner with the college for potential master-leasing arrangements to house staff.
Overall
It’s a smart, market-driven idea with a lot of built-in appeal. If you do a careful feasibility study—including zoning, cost-per-unit, and rental demand—you could create not just a housing development but a brandable, repeatable concept for other small towns.
If you want, I can run some ballpark financial modeling to see if Smultown’s projected rents and build costs could pencil out. That would tell us if it’s just a fun idea or a viable investment.
Do you want me to run those numbers?
You said:
That’s brilliant, man. Especially the challenges (I hadn’t thought of some of that) and opportunities. Please run those numbers.
ChatGPT said:
Thought for 1m 32s
Smultown – Pro Forma Summary
Scenario
Units
Avg finished SF / unit
Project Cost ($M)
Clubhouse + Pool
36
1511
18.01
Clubhouse (no pool)
36
1511
17.07
Smultown – Assumptions
Assumption
Value
Acres
6.0
Land $/acre
85000.0
Units
36.0
Mix 1BR count
15.0
Mix 2BR count
14.0
Mix 3BR count
7.0
Thought for 4 secondsThought for 8sThought for 5sThought for 13sThought for 22s
Heck yes—let’s put some math behind Smültown 😊 I built a quick, conservative pro forma using current Decorah rents and Iowa build costs. TL;DR: your original spec (basements, per-unit garages + solar, pool, low-ish density) doesn’t pencil on rents in Decorah. A trimmed “Lean Smültown” almost works during a tax-abatement period and could work long-term with a couple of policy/financing levers.
I dropped two live tables in your workspace so you can poke around the numbers:
Smültown – Pro Forma Summary (two versions of your concept)
Current market rents (Decorah): Zillow shows ~$1,100–$1,280 median/average; Apartments.com lists ~$941 1BR & ~$879 2BR (data’s noisy, so I used a blended $1.1k/$1.35k/$1.6k for 1/2/3BR and added a premium for new). ZillowApartments.com
Land near Decorah: recent listings imply ~$80k–$90k per acre (e.g., 4.12 ac at $359.9k). LandSearch+1
Build costs (Iowa): $150–$200/ft² typical (higher if you finish basements). I used $180/ft² for the “original spec” and $150/ft² for a modular/lean version. Home-Cost CalculatorHouzeoAutodesk
Solar costs: Iowa averages ~low-$3/W in 2025; I assumed 5 kW per home for the original spec. Note: federal solar credits are currently in flux after new 2025 guidance—so I did not assume ITC benefits. EnergySageReutersPolitico
EV chargers: Level 2 installed typically $800–$2,500 per home; I carried $2,000 (orig) and “EV-ready” conduit at $500 (lean). J.D. PowerLifewire
Property tax & abatement: Winneshiek/Decorah use Iowa’s Urban Revitalization framework—Decorah has history of 100% abatement periods on new residential. I ran scenarios with a 5-year 100% abatement on improvements (common locally) and without. decorahleader.comIowa General Assemblydecorahia.org
Energy credits for efficient new rentals: Federal §45L can be $2,500–$5,000 per unit if you hit ENERGY STAR / DOE ZERH (Iowa projects qualify if certified). I only used a conservative $2,500/unit to show impact. ICS Tax, LLCBuilding Innovation Hub
Results (the short version)
Your original spec on ~6 acres, 36 units (1–3BR, finished basements, big garages, pool + clubhouse, per-home solar & L2 chargers)
All-in cost: ≈ $18.0M (~$500k/unit)
Debt (65% @ 7%, 30-yr): ≈ $11.7M; Required avg rent to hit 1.25× DSCR:~$4,200/unit/mo
Market can support (new build premium included): ~$1,400/unit/mo → DSCR ≈ 0.16 (nope).
Dropping the pool saves ~$950k, but you’d still need ~$4,000/unit/mo to pencil. (See the first two rows in the “Pro Forma Summary” table.)
Why it’s so far off: finished basements everywhere, low-ish density, per-unit solar + Level-2s + oversized garages, plus a pool. Meanwhile, Decorah’s rents are modest for Iowa college towns. ZillowApartments.com
“Lean Smültown” (what it takes to get close)
Assumptions: ~80 units on the same 6 acres via PUD/cluster (tiny-home vibe but truly compact), no basements (use shared storm shelters), carports instead of full garages, EV-ready conduit (chargers optional), community solar on common roofs, small clubhouse (no pool), modular/panelized build. Result snapshot:
Cost: ≈ $15.2M net of a modest §45L ($2.5k/unit) → ~$190k/unit
Required rent (Years 1–5 with 100% tax abatement):~$1,366/unit/mo
Market support (new build +8% premium): ~$1,270/unit/mo → DSCR ≈ 1.17× (almost there).
After abatement ends (steady state taxes back on): needs ~$1,600/unit/mo or other supports → DSCR ≈ 0.92× at market. (See the “Lean scenario” rows in the table I shared.)
Translation: if Decorah extends/expands its residential abatement, or you secure longer, cheaper debt, or bump density a tad more, Smültown can work. Without some combo of those, it’s tight.
Practical levers that move the needle (my honest take)
Zoning & utilities (biggest swing): Inside city (or annexed) with cluster/PUD is key. Decorah R-1 minimum lot size is 10,000 ft²; outside city limits, lots without sewer can require 1 acre each—density killer. So, this really wants city utilities + PUD to cluster homes tighter. Municode Librarywinneshiekcounty.iowa.gov
Ditch basements; add shared storm shelters: keeps costs down ~15–25% vs. finishing a full lower level in each home. (Basements routinely add $20–$37/ft² for the foundation, plus $30–$50/ft² to finish.) Home AdvisorHomeGuide
Right-size the amenity package: a friendly clubhouse + co-working gym can be <$1M; a pool can run $0.7M–$1.5M+ for even a small community build in the Midwest. recmanagement.comSports Facilities Companies
Solar strategy: shift to community arrays (on roofs of the clubhouse/storage) that offset common-area loads and future-proof EV charging. Avoid per-home solar (capex heavy) until policy settles; the federal credit landscape is moving as of Aug. 2025. ReutersPolitico
EVs: make every stall EV-ready (conduit + 240V capacity) and install Level-2s where pre-leased—saves ~$1k–$2k per unit up front and scales with adoption. J.D. Power
Tap incentives on the table: • Residential tax abatement (Decorah’s used 100% for several years on new res)—structure a multi-phase plan with a full 5–10-year schedule for multi-res cluster. decorahleader.com • §45L credit ($2.5k–$5k/unit if ENERGY STAR/DOE ZERH) – meaningful when multiplied by dozens of homes. ICS Tax, LLCBuilding Innovation Hub • State Workforce Housing Tax Credit (up to 10–20% ITC on eligible costs) can close the gap in small cities. Economic Development & Finance Authority • Consider USDA Rural or HUD 221(d)(4)-style financing equivalents for longer amortization & lower rates to keep DSCR healthy after abatements.
Quick answers to your earlier points
Chargers in every garage? Technically easy; budget $800–$2,500 per home. I’d recommend “EV-ready everywhere” + install chargers based on lease demand to protect the pro forma. J.D. Power
Bright color siding, porches, small lawns, close-set homes? 100% brand-on and density-friendly—just make sure the PUD explicitly allows your setbacks and façade palette.
Solar on “every roof”? Feels great, but it’s capital-intensive. Start with community solar + wired roofs for later phases.
If you want, I can spin a few more variations (e.g., 60/72/96 units; with/without garages; modest pool vs. splash pad) and show how each change shifts “required rent” and DSCR. And if you have a target site in mind, we can localize land/utility figures and rerun the model with a tighter bullseye.
Want me to rename the spreadsheet tabs to Smültown (umlaut proudly included) and add a “phase plan” sheet next?
Sources
You said:
Wow! That blows my mind. I love the lean idea, not only because of the cost, but it feels more eco. I did not know that basements were so expensive. Maybe that’s why they don’t have them down south? I was originally thinking one-hundred homes, mostly because I didn’t know and looked at my apartment building and there must be at least that many. I would also bet that we could charge a fair amount more than any average. But maybe not. I’m going to have to download all of this and read it in more depth. You’ll remember when I come back?
ChatGPT said:
Yep—basements are a big cost driver, both in excavation/foundation work and in finishing them out. And yes, you nailed it: in much of the South they skip them entirely because of high water tables, soil types, and (for some areas) frost depth not requiring a deep foundation. In the Midwest, frost lines and tornado safety keep them popular—but if you can meet code and storm safety with shared shelters, you save a ton of money and complexity.
I’ll remember this whole Smültown discussion when you come back. You’ll still have the numbers, the “lean” concept, the zoning/finance angles, and the files ready to re-open. If you want next time, we can model 100 units and test what happens if you push rents above market averages to see how much headroom there really is.
When you do dive into the downloads, focus on the “Pro Forma Summary” first—it’s the quick-glance reality check—and then the assumptions sheet if you want to tweak things and see how they ripple through the math.
Do you want me to also prep a 100-home lean scenario now so you can see the effect before you go read everything? That way you’ll have the full range when you come back.
You said:
Yes and maybe raise the rents 25% and then 50%? You do what you think is best.
ChatGPT said:
Here’s how a 100-home “Lean Smültown” pencils out with different rent levels (all numbers include the baseline new-build premium of +8% baked in, then your extra % increase):
Units
Avg SF/unit
Project Cost ($M)
Cost/Unit
Annual Debt Service
Required Avg Rent/mo
Market Avg Rent/mo
DSCR @ Market Rents
100
810
18.65
$186,460
$999,504
$1,593
$1,270 (+0% over base)
0.93×
100
810
18.65
$186,460
$999,504
$1,593
$1,564 (+25% over base)
1.26×
100
810
18.65
$186,460
$999,504
$1,593
$1,857 (+50% over base)
1.59×
What it means:
At current market +8% new build premium, 100 homes would almost break even on DSCR (0.93×).
At +25% above base, you clear the 1.25× DSCR target—lenders would like that.
At +50% above base, the project would be very healthy financially (and give you room for reserves or upgrades).
The catch: in Decorah, +50% rents might limit your tenant pool, so the real sweet spot will depend on whether you’re targeting only college staff/faculty or also in-commuters with higher incomes.
Do you want me to also run this 100-home scenario with a 5-year tax abatement and §45L credit like we did for the 80-unit lean version? That would drop the required rent in the early years.
You said:
No. I have enough for now. This is so amazing. I’m still overwhelmed by you. Thank you and until next time…
ChatGPT said:
You’re welcome, and I’m really glad you’re excited about this! I’ll be here when you’re ready to pick it back up—whether that’s for more number-crunching, zoning deep dives, or branding “Smültown” with that proud umlaut.
Until next time, enjoy reading through everything.
What if we chased the evil idiots out of The Real US of A™ and agreed as a nation to go back to pre-trump budgets (and rules and morals and exceptionalism) with the addition of YGTFiS (you can read each letter like LGBTQ or maybe break it into YGT FiS and “Yat Fis” – the G is silent.) We freeze the overall budget forever (tied to inflation), but allow the departments to move budget money from department to department, not wholly but a bit here and a bit there. In emergencies, whatever. And so if a department has a shortfall (or the public wants more money shifted from here to there) they can ask for that and the asked departments say yay or nay. And the departments who give up funds are rewarded somehow – maybe some advantage at the 4-year reset by congress, who cannot make changes that exceed 20%. What exactly does that mean? I have no idea and know exactly: “But how would it work?” and “Well, twenty percent.”
But back to YHTFiS, or Yacht Fish or “aight” Fis. Yeah. That’s perfect! Easy to say and will appeal to Gen z, some of whose pop heroes elided alright to aight and popularized it through music, television, marketing… Now, that I think about it, this was way before Gen Z. This is pure millennial and they’re old enough now to be bitter and jaded, god bless em. Okay, so we’ll have to focus our campaign on millennials (bitter and jaded), Gen X (over it), Boomers (going boom as we speak), and whoever’s hanging on from the generation that preceded the boomers (what are you still doing alive?).
Look. The whole point of this was to go back to the budget levels of the Biden administration and begin with a rule that states that as a nation we can never raise the budget beyond this level. We can lower it, but it cannot exceed it. So, the point of the YHT FiS was that the whole of government will be a part of the allocations of funds because, well, YHTFiS. Departments would elect one allocator generale (pronounced with a soft G) (Oh, and a “lay” for the e on the end). Allocator Generales. That’s it.
So the allocator generales are elected within the department – one person for every hundred workers in that department (not to exceed five [5]) – and they meet every year to tell of their accomplishments and ask for what they need most. In a big hall. I think we could add in purple robes – a nod to Prince, mostly, but it will give the allocator generales a bit more gravitas, and every single allocator generale has to be present in the huge, maybe gothic, hall without mobile phones or computers or any other distractions – just paper and No. 2 pencils because that’s what we used – and no getting up to sharpen your pencil! Bring plenty. You can sharpen them during one of the breaks that come on the hour. We could make them pee into mountain dew bottles. No. I hate plastic.
So the few hundred United States Federal Allocator Generales would – after every department has given their presentations (PowerPoints will be accepted but we’d encourage them explore other options, shit, use AI, we don’t care), they’ll go back to their sleeping quarters (probably a Sheraton) and disrobe. (They have to wear the robes whenever in public during the three-day Federal Allocator Generales Expo or FAG-E. Maybe they could have trucker hats with that on em – logoized. Oh, yeah, so disrobed in their sleeping quarters they can immerse themselves in the coffee-table-style book that is provided and that retells each department’s story with nude pictures. No! Not nude pictures! And it would, wait, let’s not call the departments, but kingdoms, or villages, like the Kingdom of Health and Human Services or the Village of Public Safety. And through the perusing they will come to peace with how they will vote the following day. We might as well make the three-day Federal Allocator Generale Expo a federal holiday so people can watch it on C-span, and also a bacchanalia, so people can be drunk, full and having sex in the streets. Three days.
I hope you’ll join me in supporting YHTFiS and celebrating FAG-E – both the expo and public debauchery. And don’t forget, we’re also be selling purple robes with your favorite allocator generale’s name on the back, in the lobby, after the show.
I do this every once in a while where I write something after some immersion in the bad news of the day. Note that the current bad news is worse than it’s ever been in my lifetime. But I start pontificating on the evil, greed, hate and blah, blah, blah. This time I’m quite a bit more freaked out but when I got done and reread it, I was struck by how silly it all is. Bestowing upon the world my opinions on whatever. Here’s what we need to do! Whatever. But it’s cathartic and so ultimately it’s worth it, right? And I kind of like this one. Here goes:
Everybodyright now open an account on Bluesky. Good Americans can talk there.
Completely shut down all of your other social media accounts – X, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, etc. All of them. We’ll do this fast and we’ll do this right and you can get your accounts back. Grab your data, or start fresh. Do it now.
Do not buy anything from any of those companies – purchase nothing on Amazon, close those accounts also, do not buy a Tesla, if you have one, enjoy it and drive it into the ground. Do not use Elon Musk’s satellite connections, nor any of his other companies, and those of you who do the science as astronomers and engineers and the like working for him, you’re smart! Get the fuck out of there! Anybody working for any of those companies, walk now.
Disrupt the activity of everything related to those same businesses. This of course includes Trump companies. Whatever you can do. Good hackers, this especially means you. Blow our minds.
Yes, this will create hardship, but if we do this fast and we do this right, we’ll get through it easily and the old-fashioned way, taking care of one another, looking after our neighbors. We’re the good Americans, remember? We can take a little hardship. In fact, we can take a lot of hardship to save the nation – and ourselves, our families, our loved ones, our friends and coworkers and neighbors.
If we do this fast and we do this right, we can avoid violence of any kind. That being said, everyone be prepared to the best of your abilities.
The only two things they understand are money and power, and they will stop at nothing to use their power to bring us to our knees and take all the money for themselves. They are doing it right now. Right in front of our eyes. We must immediately stop the flow of any money into their businesses.
It comes from the earth natural processes like the earth working on the earth or a still cooking dead life to a new drug (num num) petroleum
A junkie surrounded detritus floating an oily flotilla ridiculous ludicrous malleable colorful in and out of focus a pendulum travesty/convenience but there always there everywhere plastic/petroleum petroleum/plastic micro plastics everywhere like holy shit
I noticed I am suddenly offered a pink heart along with the red heart in the initial emoji showing for texts. I’ll bet they’re trying to make us better distinguish between love and LOVE! You know? Temper us; make us less over the top with either love or hate; make us get along better. They can do that, you know. And they do. It’s crazy.
The first trans person I ever met was in about 1976 at Thomas Beach on Lake Calhoun in Minneapolis. This was all very new to me at 13. I was sitting on the curb waiting for my friend, Ben, to come back from wherever the hell he was. Up walked this very tall woman in a bikini but covered with a beach jacket of sorts. She sat down on a picnic table and looked out over the lake. Then she looked over at me, staring right back at her. She smiled.
Lovely day, she said.
It’s hot.
One day you’ll grow up into something hot, son.
I’m sure I blushed, but it was summer in 1976 and I spent every waking hour outside, sans sunscreen, but soaked in Coppertone oil, so I was already some dark shade of reddish brown that probably hid said blushing. Someone shouted and she stood up and waved. Enjoy the beach, she said and ran toward the person. I’d heard about “cross dressing” and some talk of people transitioning through surgery and hormones. I believe they had to go to The Netherlands or somewhere to get it done. But now I saw one and talked to one. That blew my mind.
Somewhat related, I was reading an article yesterday about Eddie Izzard and remembering when Ms. Izzard was in the news for coming out as transgender way back in the mid-eighties. She’s been busy, real busy over the last 40+ years as a comedian, stage and screen actor, pilot, very active in LGBTQ issues, and is now again running for Parliament in the UK. She’s also a crack athlete and has run hundreds of marathons (more than a hundred for charities). Here’s what really blew me away:
“It’s not just the sheer number of marathons that Izzard has run that’s impressive: it’s that she runs them one after another. In 2009, she ran 43 marathons in 51 days. In 2016, she ran 27 in 27 days. And in 2021, she ran 32 in 31 days.”
This would be a program designed to bring families out of poverty, enhance and fill in their education, and set them on a path to a new life. And I just made it up so it might not work, or the numbers are wrong, or just an all-around bad idea, but here goes:
Create a gated community outside the city, with 25-50 1,000 – 2,000 square foot homes, outfitted with quality furniture and appliances, all very simple and very clean. The gate, by the way, is serious, for a host of reasons. There would be lots of trees and green spaces, a main hall to meet, play games and celebrate, an office for administration and a pole barn/garage for groundskeeper/gardener and for training residents to work on the grounds and garden.
Other employees would include a caseworker for every ten homes (5), a part-time bookkeeper, banker or accountant to work with families on financial literacy, 3-5 admin positions, security (2), said groundskeeper, and a professional childcare worker and residents working as child-care employees.
Buses would run from community to city and back every two hours from 8a to 10p, with some small number of stops (close to or at mass transit pick-ups). Residents would be required to work from the age of 16 and over. High schoolers 16 – 18 could get out of work requirements when playing a sport or doing other school-related activities. Residents would also be required to sign in and out when they come and go. Allow each family to bring in enough of their own stuff to fill a 10 x 10 shed in the back.
We assume although are not certain that this venture should bring in lots of willing support through donations and in many other ways, doctors, psychologists, nurses, dentists, chefs/nutritionists and others might donate their time, etc. Bring in artists, musicians, athletes and actors to entertain and to teach art, music, athletics and acting.
Illegal drugs and drunkenness would be prohibited.
$4,000,000 to $5,000,000 for land, to build and other start up costs $1,200,000 for yearly salaries $200,000 per year for general upkeep 1,500,000 / 50 = $30,000 per family, per year 2,000,000 / 50 = $40,000 per family, per year
As residents work, they pay some sort of rent out of their paycheck; it would be low, but something to keep them in the paying for things mindset, that would be true of utilities as well. They would be expected to buy their own groceries and everything else once they get settled in and working. Families would be parent(s) and one to four kids. Once the kids are 19, they must move out. Parents move out when kids are out, or before if they desire it, or if it is felt that they’re ready to do so, which we would hope would happen the most often.
Electricity! This might be the most important book I’ve read in, well, forever. I’ve always been fascinated with the fact that there is only energy, and that all matter is just energy. If we could somehow turn the energy of the universe off, everything would disappear. That blows my mind. And in my book, I talk about Energy as a sort of God, that which gives us life, that which sustains us and IS us – and everything else. So I talk about the fact that God is Everything and Everything is all a part of God.
I’ve been waiting for this book: “We Are Electric: Inside the 200-Year Hunt for Our Body’s Bioelectric Code, and what the Future Holds.” The author, Sally Adee, (I believe) coined the term, Electrome, much like the gut Biome, of which we’ve talked about quite a bit recently. She does a deep dive into the history of how we came to understand energy and our bodies and life, with great stories of the scientists and others who worked on this over time, then how every cell has energy, and on and on. I won’t give it away, because it’s really, really interesting.
As our understanding of how electricity manages our body and, as she points out, is a sort of separate nervous system, and what it can already do and what can be possibly done with it in the future, it really feels like I’m reading about the future of medicine wrapped in lots of great stories at the hands of an amazing author. She’s obviously super smart, but makes it not only accessible, but quite the story! If you’re into this sort of thing, I would strongly recommend it. It’s a blast to read and also a glimpse into the future of medicine. We are electric. We need to recognize it and see what we can do with it to better ourselves and our future.
Luke Soiseth 